↓ Skip to main content

Morphological characterization of chicken anaemia agent (CAA)

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, March 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Morphological characterization of chicken anaemia agent (CAA)
Published in
Archives of Virology, March 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf01310522
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Gelderblom, S. Kling, R. Lurz, I. Tischer, V. v. Bülow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2000.
All research outputs
#7,559,215
of 23,058,939 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#932
of 4,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,027
of 14,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,058,939 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.