| Title |
Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. II. Mapping science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, November 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02018057 |
| Authors |
H. Small, E. Sweeney, E. Greenlee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 23% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Librarian | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 28% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 26 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 18 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,765,907
of 23,058,939 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#915
of 2,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,216
of 10,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,058,939 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them