↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 16: A Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approach to Infer Pathways Involved in Complex Disease Phenotypes
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approach to Infer Pathways Involved in Complex Disease Phenotypes
Chapter number 16
Book title
Phenotypic Screening
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7847-2_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7846-5, 978-1-4939-7847-2
Authors

Mark E. Schurdak, Fen Pei, Timothy R. Lezon, Diane Carlisle, Robert Friedlander, D. Lansing Taylor, Andrew M. Stern, Schurdak, Mark E., Pei, Fen, Lezon, Timothy R., Carlisle, Diane, Friedlander, Robert, Taylor, D. Lansing, Stern, Andrew M.

Abstract

Designing effective therapeutic strategies for complex diseases such as cancer and neurodegeneration that involve tissue context-specific interactions among multiple gene products presents a major challenge for precision medicine. Safe and selective pharmacological modulation of individual molecular entities associated with a disease often fails to provide efficacy in the clinic. Thus, development of optimized therapeutic strategies for individual patients with complex diseases requires a more comprehensive, systems-level understanding of disease progression. Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) is an approach to drug discovery that integrates computational and experimental methods to understand the molecular pathogenesis of a disease at the systems level more completely. Described here is the chemogenomic component of QSP for the inference of biological pathways involved in the modulation of the disease phenotype. The approach involves testing sets of compounds of diverse mechanisms of action in a disease-relevant phenotypic assay, and using the mechanistic information known for the active compounds, to infer pathways and networks associated with the phenotype. The example used here is for monogenic Huntington's disease (HD), which due to the pleiotropic nature of the mutant phenotype has a complex pathogenesis. The overall approach, however, is applicable to any complex disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Mathematics 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,614,622
of 23,058,939 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,979
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,685
of 442,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,058,939 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.