| Title |
Review of clinical trial settings of drugs commonly used in primary care and approved between 2005 and 2012
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-018-4486-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason R. Crossley, Tina P. Tan, Keisha Herbin Smith, Joseph S. Ross, Daniel J. Merenstein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 48% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 57% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2018.
All research outputs
#676,660
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#557
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,960
of 332,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#18
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.