↓ Skip to main content

Has Athletic Performance Reached its Peak?

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
79 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Has Athletic Performance Reached its Peak?
Published in
Sports Medicine, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40279-015-0347-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoffroy Berthelot, Adrien Sedeaud, Adrien Marck, Juliana Antero-Jacquemin, Julien Schipman, Guillaume Saulière, Andy Marc, François-Denis Desgorces, Jean-François Toussaint

Abstract

Limits to athletic performance have long been a topic of myth and debate. However, sport performance appears to have reached a state of stagnation in recent years, suggesting that the physical capabilities of humans and other athletic species, such as greyhounds and thoroughbreds, cannot progress indefinitely. Although the ultimate capabilities may be predictable, the exact path for the absolute maximal performance values remains difficult to assess and relies on technical innovations, sport regulation, and other parameters that depend on current societal and economic conditions. The aim of this literature review was to assess the possible plateau of top physical capabilities in various events and detail the historical backgrounds and sociocultural, anthropometrical, and physiological factors influencing the progress and regression of athletic performance. Time series of performances in Olympic disciplines, such as track and field and swimming events, from 1896 to 2012 reveal a major decrease in performance development. Such a saturation effect is simultaneous in greyhound, thoroughbred, and frog performances. The genetic condition, exhaustion of phenotypic pools, economic context, and the depletion of optimal morphological traits contribute to the observed limitation of physical capabilities. Present conditions prevailing, we approach absolute physical limits and endure a continued period of world record scarcity. Optional scenarios for further improvements will mostly depend on sport technology and modification competition rules.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 173 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Master 19 11%
Other 8 5%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 45 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 62 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 49 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#339,224
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#328
of 2,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,500
of 279,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.