↓ Skip to main content

Developing a Safer Conception Intervention for Men Living with HIV in South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Developing a Safer Conception Intervention for Men Living with HIV in South Africa
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10461-017-1719-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hazar Khidir, Christina Psaros, Letitia Greener, Kasey O’Neil, Mxolisi Mathenjwa, F. N. Mosery, Lizzie Moore, Abigail Harrison, David R. Bangsberg, Jennifer A. Smit, Steven A. Safren, Lynn T. Matthews

Abstract

Within sexual partnerships, men make many decisions about sexual behavior, reproductive goals, and HIV prevention. There are increasing calls to involve men in reproductive health and HIV prevention. This paper describes the process of creating and evaluating the acceptability of a safer conception intervention for men living with HIV who want to have children with partners at risk for acquiring HIV in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Based on formative work conducted with men and women living with HIV, their partners, and providers, we developed an intervention based on principles of cognitive-behavioral therapy to support men in the adoption of HIV risk-reduction behaviors such as HIV-serostatus disclosure and uptake of and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Structured group discussions were used to explore intervention acceptability and feasibility. Our work demonstrates that men are eager for reproductive health services, but face unique barriers to accessing them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 32 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 16%
Social Sciences 15 13%
Psychology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,572,005
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#2,846
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,484
of 430,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#74
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.