↓ Skip to main content

Lip cancer and pre-cancerous lesions harbor TP53 mutations, exhibit allelic loss at 9p, 9q, and 17p, but no BRAFV600E mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Lip cancer and pre-cancerous lesions harbor TP53 mutations, exhibit allelic loss at 9p, 9q, and 17p, but no BRAFV600E mutations
Published in
Tumor Biology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-3659-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gefter Thiago Batista Correa, Vanessa Fátima Bernardes, Silvia Ferreira de Sousa, Marina Gonçalves Diniz, José Maria Porcaro Salles, Renan Pedra Souza, Alfredo Maurício Batista De-Paula, Ricardo Santiago Gomez, Carolina Cavalieri Gomes

Abstract

Molecular mechanisms of lip squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and actinic cheilitis (AC) are unclear. We aimed at assessing loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and TP53 and BRAF V600E mutations in these lesions. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of 17 LSCC and 16 AC were included, with additional 5 fresh LSCC genotyped for TP53 mutations. LOH was assessed by six polymorphic markers located at 9p22, 9q22, and 17p13 and correlated with cell proliferation (Ki-67) and P53 immunostaining. Direct sequencing of TP53 exons 2-11 (fresh samples), and exons 5-9 (FFPE samples) was carried out. BRAF V600E mutation was genotyped in eight LSCC. LOH occurred in at least one marker in 15/17 LSCC and in 9/16 AC. The marker exhibiting the highest frequency of allelic loss (FAL) in LSCC was D9S157 (8/12 informative cases) and D9S287 in AC (4/11 informative cases). Cell proliferation was not correlated with LOH or with the FAL and no correlation between P53 IHC and 17p LOH was observed. We found TP53 missense mutations in both lesions and nonsense in LSCC, including CC>TT transition, which is a marker of UV damage. BRAF V600E mutation was not detected. LOH and TP53 mutations detected in LSCC and AC may be associated with tumorigenesis, whereas BRAF V600E mutation does not seem to significantly contribute to LSCC pathogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 14 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,007,660
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#331
of 2,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,388
of 268,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#16
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.