You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Place of Faith for Consultant Obstetricians Following Stillbirth: A Qualitative Exploratory Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Religion and Health, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10943-015-0077-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Nuzum, Sarah Meaney, Keelin O’Donoghue |
| Abstract |
Stillbirth remains among the most challenging areas in obstetric practice. The objectives of this study were to explore the impact of stillbirth on the faith of obstetricians. Semi-structured in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with obstetricians focusing on the impact of stillbirth on their faith. Data were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Stillbirth was identified as one of the most difficult experiences, and most consultants were unable to engage with their personal beliefs when dealing with death at work. The major study themes were conflict of personal faith and incongruence between personal faith and professional practice. This study highlights a gap in how obstetricians see their own faith and feeling able to respond to the faith needs of bereaved parents. Participating obstetricians did not demonstrate that spirituality was an integrated part of their professional life. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 4 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 38% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 14% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,374,317
of 24,229,740 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#188
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,475
of 268,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,229,740 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.