↓ Skip to main content

Time-dependent risk factors associated with the decline of estimated GFR in CKD patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Time-dependent risk factors associated with the decline of estimated GFR in CKD patients
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10157-015-1132-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen-xiu Chang, Shigeyuki Arai, Yoshifuru Tamura, Takanori Kumagai, Tatsuru Ota, Shigeru Shibata, Yoshihide Fujigaki, Zhong-yang Shen, Shunya Uchida

Abstract

Targeting the modifiable risk factors may help halt the progression of CKD, thus risk factor analysis is better performed using the parameters in the follow-up. This study aimed to examine the time-dependent risk factors for CKD progression using time-averaged values and to investigate the characteristics of rapid progression group. This is a retrospective cohort study enrolling 770 patients of CKD stage 3-4. Time-dependent parameters were calculated as time-averaged values by a trapezoidal rule. % decline of estimated GFR (eGFR) per year from entry was divided to three groups: <10 % (stable), 10-25 % (moderate progression), and ≥25 % (rapid progression). Multivariate regression analyses were employed for the baseline and the time-averaged datasets. eGFR decline was 2.83 ± 4.04 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year (8.8 ± 12.9 %) in male and 1.66 ± 3.23 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year (5.4 ± 11.0 %) in female (p < 0.001). % decline of eGFR was associated with male, proteinuria, phosphorus, and systolic blood pressure as risk factors and with age, albumin, and hemoglobin as protective factors using either dataset. Baseline eGFR and diabetic nephropathy appeared in the baseline dataset, while uric acid appeared in the time-averaged dataset. The rapid progression group was associated with proteinuria, phosphorus, albumin, and hemoglobin in the follow-up. These results suggest that time-averaged values provide insightful clinical guide in targeting the risk factors. Rapid decline of eGFR is strongly associated with hyperphosphatemia, proteinuria, and anemia indicating that these risk factors should be intervened in the follow-up of CKD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 20%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 20%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Chemistry 1 3%
Unknown 13 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,916,059
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#101
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,222
of 265,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them