↓ Skip to main content

Digital Technologies in the Treatment of Anxiety: Recent Innovations and Future Directions

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
63 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
Title
Digital Technologies in the Treatment of Anxiety: Recent Innovations and Future Directions
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11920-018-0910-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Firth, John Torous, Rebekah Carney, Jill Newby, Theodore D. Cosco, Helen Christensen, Jerome Sarris

Abstract

This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the efficacy, limitations, and future of e-health treatments for anxiety. Within this, we provide detail on "first-generation" e-health approaches, such as computerized therapies. Additionally, we assess the emergence and early efficacy of newer methods of treatment delivery, including smartphone apps and virtual reality interventions, discussing the potential and pitfalls for each. There is now substantial clinical research demonstrating the efficacy of internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of anxiety. However, the ability of these interventions for engaging patients in "real-world" settings is unclear. Recently, smartphone apps for anxiety have presented a more popular and ubiquitous method of intervention delivery, although the evidence base supporting these newer approaches drastically falls behind the extensive marketing and commercialization efforts currently driving their development. Meanwhile, the increasing availability of novel technologies, such as "virtual reality" (VR), introduces further potential of e-health treatments for generalized anxiety and anxiety-related disorders such as phobias and obsessive compulsive disorder, while also creating additional challenges for research. Although still in its infancy, e-health research is already presenting several promising avenues for delivering effective and scalable treatments for anxiety. Nonetheless, several important steps must be taken in order for academic research to keep pace with continued technological advances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 278 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 16%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 91 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 76 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 9%
Computer Science 14 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Engineering 11 4%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 104 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,111,618
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#136
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,856
of 344,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.