↓ Skip to main content

Integrated In Silico Fragment-Based Drug Design: Case Study with Allosteric Modulators on Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5

Overview of attention for article published in The AAPS Journal, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Integrated In Silico Fragment-Based Drug Design: Case Study with Allosteric Modulators on Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5
Published in
The AAPS Journal, May 2017
DOI 10.1208/s12248-017-0093-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuemin Bian, Zhiwei Feng, Peng Yang, Xiang-Qun Xie

Abstract

GPCR allosteric modulators target at the allosteric binding pockets of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with indirect influence on the effects of an orthosteric ligand. Such modulators exhibit significant advantages compared to the corresponding orthosteric ligands, including better chemical tractability or physicochemical properties, improved selectivity, and reduced risk of oversensitization towards their receptors. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5), a member of class C GPCRs, is a promising therapeutic target for treating many central nervous system diseases. The crystal structure of mGlu5 in the complex with the negative allosteric modulator mavoglurant was recently reported, providing a fundamental model for designing new allosteric modulators. Computational fragment-based drug discovery represents a powerful scaffold-hopping and lead structure-optimization tool for drug design. In the present work, a set of integrated computational methodologies was first used, such as fragment library generation and retrosynthetic combinatorial analysis procedure (RECAP) for novel compound generation. Then, the compounds generated were assessed by benchmark dataset verification, docking studies, and QSAR model simulation. Subsequently, structurally diverse compounds, with reported or unreported scaffolds, can be observed from top 20 in silico synthesized compounds, which were predicted to be potential mGlu5 modulators. In silico compounds with reported scaffolds may fill SAR holes in known, patented series of mGlu5 modulators. And the generation of compounds without reported tests on mGluR indicates that our approach is doable for exploring and designing novel compounds. Our case study of designing allosteric modulators on mGlu5 demonstrated that the established computational fragment-based approach is a useful methodology for facilitating new compound design in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 21%
Chemistry 7 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Computer Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,614,622
of 23,058,939 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#1,109
of 1,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,215
of 316,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#18
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,058,939 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.