↓ Skip to main content

Identification of tetraploid regenerants from cotyledons of diploid watermelon cultured in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Euphytica, January 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Identification of tetraploid regenerants from cotyledons of diploid watermelon cultured in vitro
Published in
Euphytica, January 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00023744
Authors

Michael E. Compton, D. J. Gray, G. W. Elmstrom

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,559,215
of 23,058,939 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#329
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,902
of 79,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,058,939 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.