You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanisms of environmental chemicals that enable the cancer hallmark of evasion of growth suppression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Carcinogenesis, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1093/carcin/bgv028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rita Nahta, Fahd Al-Mulla, Rabeah Al-Temaimi, Amedeo Amedei, Rafaela Andrade-Vieira, Sarah N. Bay, Dustin G. Brown, Gloria M. Calaf, Robert C. Castellino, Karine A. Cohen-Solal, Anna Maria Colacci, Nichola Cruickshanks, Paul Dent, Riccardo Di Fiore, Stefano Forte, Gary S. Goldberg, Roslida A. Hamid, Harini Krishnan, Dale W. Laird, Ahmed Lasfar, Paola A. Marignani, Lorenzo Memeo, Chiara Mondello, Christian C. Naus, Richard Ponce-Cusi, Jayadev Raju, Debasish Roy, Rabindra Roy, Elizabeth P. Ryan, Hosni K. Salem, A.Ivana Scovassi, Neetu Singh, Monica Vaccari, Renza Vento, Jan Vondráček, Mark Wade, Jordan Woodrick, William H. Bisson |
| Abstract |
As part of the Halifax Project, this review brings attention to the potential effects of environmental chemicals on important molecular and cellular regulators of the cancer hallmark of evading growth suppression. Specifically, we review the mechanisms by which cancer cells escape the growth-inhibitory signals of p53, retinoblastoma protein, transforming growth factor-beta, gap junctions and contact inhibition. We discuss the effects of selected environmental chemicals on these mechanisms of growth inhibition and cross-reference the effects of these chemicals in other classical cancer hallmarks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 36 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2015.
All research outputs
#2,364,104
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Carcinogenesis
#214
of 4,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,431
of 264,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carcinogenesis
#4
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.