↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment: the challenge ahead

Overview of attention for article published in Carcinogenesis, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 4,906)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
39 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
104 X users
facebook
49 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
238 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
497 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment: the challenge ahead
Published in
Carcinogenesis, June 2015
DOI 10.1093/carcin/bgv039
Pubmed ID
Authors

William H Goodson, Leroy Lowe, David O Carpenter, Michael Gilbertson, Abdul Manaf Ali, Adela Lopez de Cerain Salsamendi, Ahmed Lasfar, Amancio Carnero, Amaya Azqueta, Amedeo Amedei, Amelia K Charles, Andrew R Collins, Andrew Ward, Anna C Salzberg, Annamaria Colacci, Ann-Karin Olsen, Arthur Berg, Barry J Barclay, Binhua P Zhou, Carmen Blanco-Aparicio, Carolyn J Baglole, Chenfang Dong, Chiara Mondello, Chia-Wen Hsu, Christian C Naus, Clement Yedjou, Colleen S Curran, Dale W Laird, Daniel C Koch, Danielle J Carlin, Dean W Felsher, Debasish Roy, Dustin G Brown, Edward Ratovitski, Elizabeth P Ryan, Emanuela Corsini, Emilio Rojas, Eun-Yi Moon, Ezio Laconi, Fabio Marongiu, Fahd Al-Mulla, Ferdinando Chiaradonna, Firouz Darroudi, Francis L Martin, Frederik J Van Schooten, Gary S Goldberg, Gerard Wagemaker, Gladys N Nangami, Gloria M Calaf, Graeme Williams, Gregory T Wolf, Gudrun Koppen, Gunnar Brunborg, H Kim Lyerly, Harini Krishnan, Hasiah Ab Hamid, Hemad Yasaei, Hideko Sone, Hiroshi Kondoh, Hosni K Salem, Hsue-Yin Hsu, Hyun Ho Park, Igor Koturbash, Isabelle R Miousse, A Ivana Scovassi, James E Klaunig, Jan Vondráček, Jayadev Raju, Jesse Roman, John Pierce Wise, Jonathan R Whitfield, Jordan Woodrick, Joseph A Christopher, Josiah Ochieng, Juan Fernando Martinez-Leal, Judith Weisz, Julia Kravchenko, Jun Sun, Kalan R Prudhomme, Kannan Badri Narayanan, Karine A Cohen-Solal, Kim Moorwood, Laetitia Gonzalez, Laura Soucek, Le Jian, Leandro S D'Abronzo, Liang-Tzung Lin, Lin Li, Linda Gulliver, Lisa J McCawley, Lorenzo Memeo, Louis Vermeulen, Luc Leyns, Luoping Zhang, Mahara Valverde, Mahin Khatami, Maria Fiammetta Romano, Marion Chapellier, Marc A Williams, Mark Wade, Masoud H Manjili, Matilde E Lleonart, Menghang Xia, Michael J Gonzalez, Michalis V Karamouzis, Micheline Kirsch-Volders, Monica Vaccari, Nancy B Kuemmerle, Neetu Singh, Nichola Cruickshanks, Nicole Kleinstreuer, Nik van Larebeke, Nuzhat Ahmed, Olugbemiga Ogunkua, P K Krishnakumar, Pankaj Vadgama, Paola A Marignani, Paramita M Ghosh, Patricia Ostrosky-Wegman, Patricia A Thompson, Paul Dent, Petr Heneberg, Philippa Darbre, Po Sing Leung, Pratima Nangia-Makker, Qiang Shawn Cheng, R Brooks Robey, Rabeah Al-Temaimi, Rabindra Roy, Rafaela Andrade-Vieira, Ranjeet K Sinha, Rekha Mehta, Renza Vento, Riccardo Di Fiore, Richard Ponce-Cusi, Rita Dornetshuber-Fleiss, Rita Nahta, Robert C Castellino, Roberta Palorini, Roslida Abd Hamid, Sabine A S Langie, Sakina E Eltom, Samira A Brooks, Sandra Ryeom, Sandra S Wise, Sarah N Bay, Shelley A Harris, Silvana Papagerakis, Simona Romano, Sofia Pavanello, Staffan Eriksson, Stefano Forte, Stephanie C Casey, Sudjit Luanpitpong, Tae-Jin Lee, Takemi Otsuki, Tao Chen, Thierry Massfelder, Thomas Sanderson, Tiziana Guarnieri, Tove Hultman, Valérian Dormoy, Valerie Odero-Marah, Venkata Sabbisetti, Veronique Maguer-Satta, W Kimryn Rathmell, Wilhelm Engström, William K Decker, William H Bisson, Yon Rojanasakul, Yunus Luqmani, Zhenbang Chen, Zhiwei Hu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 497 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 487 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 87 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 11%
Other 44 9%
Student > Master 40 8%
Student > Bachelor 36 7%
Other 111 22%
Unknown 125 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 11%
Environmental Science 27 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 5%
Other 93 19%
Unknown 155 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 429. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#67,376
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from Carcinogenesis
#11
of 4,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#616
of 278,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carcinogenesis
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.