| Title |
Image-guided decision support system for pathology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Machine Vision and Applications, December 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001380050104 |
| Authors |
Dorin Comaniciu, Peter Meer, David J. Foran |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 24 | 46% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 17% |
| Engineering | 6 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Machine Vision and Applications
#74
of 599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,578
of 107,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machine Vision and Applications
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 599 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.