↓ Skip to main content

Annular Long Josephson Junctions in a Magnetic Field: Engineering and Probing the Fluxon Interaction Potential

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Low Temperature Physics, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Annular Long Josephson Junctions in a Magnetic Field: Engineering and Probing the Fluxon Interaction Potential
Published in
Journal of Low Temperature Physics, March 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1004674908169
Authors

A. Wallraff, Yu. Koval, M. Levitchev, M. V. Fistul, A. V. Ustinov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 10 83%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2005.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Low Temperature Physics
#155
of 751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,754
of 41,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Low Temperature Physics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 751 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them