↓ Skip to main content

Reflections on the current debate on how to link flood insurance and disaster risk reduction in the European Union

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Reflections on the current debate on how to link flood insurance and disaster risk reduction in the European Union
Published in
Natural Hazards, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1832-5
Authors

S. Surminski, J. C. J. H. Aerts, W. J. W. Botzen, P. Hudson, J. Mysiak, C. D. Pérez-Blanco

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 103 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 28%
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Master 18 17%
Other 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 15%
Social Sciences 15 14%
Engineering 9 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 8%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,179,822
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#180
of 1,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,060
of 265,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.