↓ Skip to main content

The phylogenetic relationships ofEeniella nana Smith, Batenburg-van der Vegte et Scheffers based on the partial sequences of 18S and 26S ribosomal RNAs (Candidaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, June 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
The phylogenetic relationships ofEeniella nana Smith, Batenburg-van der Vegte et Scheffers based on the partial sequences of 18S and 26S ribosomal RNAs (Candidaceae)
Published in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, June 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf01573957
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuzo Yamada, Minako Matsuda, Kozaburo Mikata

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 60%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2006.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#575
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,345
of 23,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.