| Title |
Hypotensive effects of hawthorn for patients with diabetes taking prescription drugs: a randomised controlled trial.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2006
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ann F Walker, Georgios Marakis, Eleanor Simpson, Jessica L Hope, Paul A Robinson, Mohamed Hassanein, Hugh C R Simpson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 44 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,238,104
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#571
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,970
of 86,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.