↓ Skip to main content

Polypeptide growth factors in metanephric growth and segmental nephron differentiation

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, July 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Polypeptide growth factors in metanephric growth and segmental nephron differentiation
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, July 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00862522
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellis D. Avner, William E. Sweeney

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2009.
All research outputs
#7,560,078
of 23,061,402 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,522
of 3,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,470
of 15,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,061,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,593 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them