↓ Skip to main content

Cluster analysis of behavioural weight management strategies and associations with weight change in young women: a longitudinal analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Obesity, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
4 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cluster analysis of behavioural weight management strategies and associations with weight change in young women: a longitudinal analysis
Published in
International Journal of Obesity, June 2015
DOI 10.1038/ijo.2015.116
Pubmed ID
Authors

C D Madigan, A J Daley, E Kabir, P Aveyard, W Brown

Abstract

Maintaining a healthy weight is important for the prevention of many chronic diseases. Little is known about the strategies used by young women to manage their weight, or the effectiveness of these in preventing weight gain. We aimed to identify clusters of weight control strategies used by women and determine the average annual weight change among women in each cluster from 2000 to 2009. Latent cluster analysis of weight control strategies reported by 8125 participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study of Women's Health. Analyses were performed in March-November 2014. Weight control strategies were used by 79% of the women, and four unique clusters were found. The largest cluster group (39.7%) was named dieters as 90% had been on a diet in the past year, and half of these women had lost 5 kg on purpose. Women cut down on size of meals, fats and sugars and took part in vigorous physical activity. Additionally 20% had used a commercial programme. The next largest cluster (30.2%) was the healthy living group who followed the public health messages of 'eat less and move more'. The do nothing group (20%) did not actively control their weight whereas the perpetual dieters group (10.7%) used all strategies, including unhealthy behaviours. On average women gained 700 g per year (over nine years), however the perpetual dieters group gained significantly more weight (210 g) than the do nothing group (P<0.001). Most women are actively trying to control their weight. The most successful approach was to follow the public health guidelines on health eating and physical activity.International Journal of Obesity accepted article preview online, 22 June 2015. doi:10.1038/ijo.2015.116.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2018.
All research outputs
#788,692
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Obesity
#424
of 4,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,186
of 263,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Obesity
#12
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.