↓ Skip to main content

A Social Identity Approach to Sport Psychology: Principles, Practice, and Prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
24 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
420 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Social Identity Approach to Sport Psychology: Principles, Practice, and Prospects
Published in
Sports Medicine, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40279-015-0345-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Rees, S. Alexander Haslam, Pete Coffee, David Lavallee

Abstract

Drawing on social identity theory and self-categorization theory, we outline an approach to sport psychology that understands groups not simply as features of sporting contexts but rather as elements that can be, and often are, incorporated into a person's sense of self and, through this, become powerful determinants of their sport-related behavior. The underpinnings of this social identity approach are outlined, and four key lessons for sport that are indicative of the analytical and practical power of the approach are presented. These suggest that social identity is the basis for sports group (1) behavior, (2) formation and development, (3) support and stress appraisal, and (4) leadership. Building on recent developments within sport science, we outline an agenda for future research by identifying a range of topics to which the social identity approach could fruitfully contribute.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 420 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 87 21%
Student > Master 62 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 15%
Researcher 21 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 59 14%
Unknown 110 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 112 27%
Psychology 99 24%
Social Sciences 42 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 2%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 114 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#523,085
of 24,469,913 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#496
of 2,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,813
of 268,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,469,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.