↓ Skip to main content

Strength training does not influence serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Strength training does not influence serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00421-010-1461-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maaike Goekint, Kevin De Pauw, Bart Roelands, Rose Njemini, Ivan Bautmans, Tony Mets, Romain Meeusen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 267 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 9%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 70 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 18%
Sports and Recreations 47 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Psychology 19 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 5%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 81 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#20,575,286
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#3,721
of 4,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,317
of 108,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#31
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.