↓ Skip to main content

Cellulose: a random walk along its historical path

Overview of attention for article published in Cellulose, March 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
Title
Cellulose: a random walk along its historical path
Published in
Cellulose, March 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00818796
Authors

David N. -S. Hon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 383 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 21%
Student > Master 79 20%
Student > Bachelor 50 13%
Researcher 36 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 44 11%
Unknown 78 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 81 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 12%
Materials Science 44 11%
Engineering 43 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 6%
Other 51 13%
Unknown 98 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2011.
All research outputs
#7,560,078
of 23,061,402 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#251
of 915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,563
of 22,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,061,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 915 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them