| Title |
Molecular cloning and characterisation of the ribC gene from Bacillus subtilis : a point mutation in ribC results in riboflavin overproduction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, March 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004380050393 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Coquard, M. Huecas, M. Ott, J. M. van Dijl, A. P. G. M. van Loon, H.-P. Hohmann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 32% |
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 27% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2006.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#234
of 1,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,725
of 30,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#11
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.