| Title |
LMA-Classic™ and LMA-ProSeal™ are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03020191 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Roger Maltby, Michael T. Beriault, Neil C. Watson, David J. Liepert, Gordon H. Fick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 65% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,400,640
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,216
of 2,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,018
of 137,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.