↓ Skip to main content

Genetic map of Escherichia coli strain C

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics and Genomics, March 1970
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Genetic map of Escherichia coli strain C
Published in
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, March 1970
DOI 10.1007/bf00433220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marianne Wiman, G. Bertani, Beatrice Kelly, I. Sasaki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#920
of 3,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#556
of 2,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.