↓ Skip to main content

Carbon stocks and soil sequestration rates of tropical riverine wetlands

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeosciences, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbon stocks and soil sequestration rates of tropical riverine wetlands
Published in
Biogeosciences, June 2015
DOI 10.5194/bg-12-3805-2015
Authors

M. F. Adame, N. S. Santini, C. Tovilla, A. Vázquez-Lule, L. Castro, M. Guevara

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 276 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 17%
Student > Master 44 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Other 14 5%
Other 44 16%
Unknown 62 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 96 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 10%
Chemistry 7 2%
Chemical Engineering 2 <1%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 78 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2015.
All research outputs
#5,128,622
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Biogeosciences
#1,367
of 3,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,393
of 278,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeosciences
#23
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.