↓ Skip to main content

Aortic Dissection in an Infant Caused by Intraaortic Balloon Pumping

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Aortic Dissection in an Infant Caused by Intraaortic Balloon Pumping
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s002469900489
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Sakurai, M. Maeda, N. Sai, K. Miyahara, M. Nakayama, H. Takemura

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2006.
All research outputs
#7,560,078
of 23,061,402 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#278
of 1,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,521
of 222,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#8
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,061,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.