| Title |
Antihuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) activities of inhibitors of polyamine pathways
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, April 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02255534 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter K. Chiang, Peter P. McCann, James R. Lane, Marvin C. Pankaskie, Donald S. Burke, Douglas L. Mayers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 75% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2012.
All research outputs
#4,766,364
of 23,061,402 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#178
of 999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,517
of 27,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,061,402 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them