↓ Skip to main content

Comparative molecular field analysis of artemisinin derivatives: Ab initio versus semiempirical optimized structures

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, July 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Comparative molecular field analysis of artemisinin derivatives: Ab initio versus semiempirical optimized structures
Published in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, July 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1008002602653
Pubmed ID
Authors

Somsak Tonmunphean, Sirirat Kokpol, Vudhichai Parasuk, Peter Wolschann, Rudolf H. Winger, Klaus R. Liedl, Bernd M. Rode

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 67%
Professor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 83%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2006.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#420
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,358
of 32,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them