| Title |
Phylogenetic Relationships of Amaryllidaceae Based on matK Sequence Data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Plant Research, June 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/pl00013874 |
| Authors |
Motomi Ito, Atsushi Kawamoto, Yoko Kita, Tomohisa Yukawa, Siro Kurita |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2009.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#278
of 1,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,564
of 35,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them