↓ Skip to main content

Radial maze as a tool for assessing the effect of drugs on the working memory of rats

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, July 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Radial maze as a tool for assessing the effect of drugs on the working memory of rats
Published in
Psychopharmacology, July 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf00464578
Pubmed ID
Authors

O. Burešová, J. Bureš

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 33%
Neuroscience 2 22%
Computer Science 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2004.
All research outputs
#7,560,078
of 23,061,402 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,113
of 5,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,943
of 7,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,061,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.