You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hemochromatosis and Iron-Overload Screening in a Racially Diverse Population
|
---|---|
Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2005
|
DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa041534 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul C. Adams, David M. Reboussin, James C. Barton, Christine E. McLaren, John H. Eckfeldt, Gordon D. McLaren, Fitzroy W. Dawkins, Ronald T. Acton, Emily L. Harris, Victor R. Gordeuk, Catherine Leiendecker-Foster, Mark Speechley, Beverly M. Snively, Joan L. Holup, Elizabeth Thomson, Phyliss Sholinsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 265 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 50 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 37 | 14% |
Student > Master | 25 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
Other | 18 | 7% |
Other | 67 | 24% |
Unknown | 58 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 37% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 2% |
Chemistry | 6 | 2% |
Other | 29 | 11% |
Unknown | 71 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,565,469
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#12,071
of 32,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,171
of 70,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#36
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.