↓ Skip to main content

Editorial Introduction

Overview of attention for article published in Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 128)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Editorial Introduction
Published in
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, April 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1010026829303
Authors

Wolfgang Banzhaf

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 13%
Italy 1 7%
Unknown 12 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 60%
Engineering 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
#42
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,853
of 40,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them