| Title |
Screening for Dysphagia in Adult Patients with Stroke: Assessing the Accuracy of Informal Detection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00455-018-9885-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victoria Sherman, Heather Flowers, Moira K. Kapral, Gordon Nicholson, Frank Silver, Rosemary Martino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,352,398
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#219
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,482
of 348,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.