| Title |
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Social Skills in Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: The UCLA PEERS® Program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-015-2504-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth A. Laugeson, Alexander Gantman, Steven K. Kapp, Kaely Orenski, Ruth Ellingsen |
| Abstract |
Research suggests that impaired social skills are often the most significant challenge for those with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), yet few evidence-based social skills interventions exist for adults on the spectrum. This replication trial tested the effectiveness of PEERS, a caregiver-assisted social skills program for high-functioning young adults with ASD. Using a randomized controlled design, 22 young adults 18-24 years of age were randomly assigned to a treatment (n = 12) or delayed treatment control (n = 10) group. Results revealed that the treatment group improved significantly in overall social skills, frequency of social engagement, and social skills knowledge, and significantly reduced ASD symptoms related to social responsiveness following PEERS. Most treatment gains were maintained at a 16-week follow-up assessment with new improvements observed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 390 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 11% |
| Researcher | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 60 | 15% |
| Unknown | 111 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 133 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 8% |
| Unknown | 124 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,813,241
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#742
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,032
of 278,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#13
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.