| Title |
Following the migration of a Toxocara larva in the retina by optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10384-004-0157-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takashi Suzuki, Takeshi Joko, Nobuaki Akao, Yuichi Ohashi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 31% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 19% |
| Engineering | 2 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,558,494
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#70
of 494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,968
of 60,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 494 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.