↓ Skip to main content

A Public-Key Cryptosystem Using Purely Cubic Fields

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cryptology, March 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
A Public-Key Cryptosystem Using Purely Cubic Fields
Published in
Journal of Cryptology, March 1998
DOI 10.1007/s001459900038
Authors

R. Scheidler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 29%
Student > Master 7 23%
Professor 3 10%
Lecturer 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 22 71%
Mathematics 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Design 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,560,078
of 23,061,402 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cryptology
#89
of 238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,893
of 32,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cryptology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,061,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them