↓ Skip to main content

Two distinct HLA-A*0101-specific submotifs illustrate alternative peptide binding modes

Overview of attention for article published in Immunogenetics, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Two distinct HLA-A*0101-specific submotifs illustrate alternative peptide binding modes
Published in
Immunogenetics, January 1997
DOI 10.1007/s002510050200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akihiro Kondo, John Sidney, Scott Southwood, Marie-France del Guercio, Ettore Appella, Hiroshi Sakamoto, Howard M. Grey, Esteban Celis, Robert W. Chesnut, Ralph T. Kubo, A. Sette

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Immunogenetics
#350
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,960
of 92,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunogenetics
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.