You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The 10 Australian ecosystems most vulnerable to tipping points
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.01.016 |
| Authors |
William F. Laurance, Bernard Dell, Stephen M. Turton, Michael J. Lawes, Lindsay B. Hutley, Hamish McCallum, Patricia Dale, Michael Bird, Giles Hardy, Gavin Prideaux, Ben Gawne, Clive R. McMahon, Richard Yu, Jean-Marc Hero, Lin Schwarzkopf, Andrew Krockenberger, Michael Douglas, Ewen Silvester, Michael Mahony, Karen Vella, Udoy Saikia, Carl-Henrik Wahren, Zhihong Xu, Bradley Smith, Chris Cocklin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 13 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 388 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 82 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 9% |
| Professor | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 86 | 20% |
| Unknown | 71 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 150 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 110 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 32 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Unknown | 85 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,620,103
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,381
of 6,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,681
of 126,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#6
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.