↓ Skip to main content

Benefits of Automated Crystallization Plate Tracking, Imaging, and Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Folding & Design, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benefits of Automated Crystallization Plate Tracking, Imaging, and Analysis
Published in
Folding & Design, February 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.str.2004.12.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J. Mayo, Jonathan M. Diprose, Thomas S. Walter, Ian M. Berry, Julie Wilson, Ray J. Owens, E. Yvonne Jones, Karl Harlos, David I. Stuart, Robert M. Esnouf

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 23%
Chemistry 3 9%
Chemical Engineering 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,544,090
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Folding & Design
#1,833
of 3,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,996
of 158,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folding & Design
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.