↓ Skip to main content

Incorporating phosphorus cycling into global modeling efforts: a worthwhile, tractable endeavor

Overview of attention for article published in New Phytologist, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
31 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incorporating phosphorus cycling into global modeling efforts: a worthwhile, tractable endeavor
Published in
New Phytologist, June 2015
DOI 10.1111/nph.13521
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sasha C Reed, Xiaojuan Yang, Peter E Thornton

Abstract

I. II. III. IV. References SUMMARY: Myriad field, laboratory, and modeling studies show that nutrient availability plays a fundamental role in regulating CO2 exchange between the Earth's biosphere and atmosphere, and in determining how carbon pools and fluxes respond to climatic change. Accordingly, global models that incorporate coupled climate-carbon cycle feedbacks made a significant advance with the introduction of a prognostic nitrogen cycle. Here we propose that incorporating phosphorus cycling represents an important next step in coupled climate-carbon cycling model development, particularly for lowland tropical forests where phosphorus availability is often presumed to limit primary production. We highlight challenges to including phosphorus in modeling efforts and provide suggestions for how to move forward.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 202 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 22%
Researcher 41 19%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 32%
Environmental Science 48 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 51 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,244,214
of 24,037,100 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#1,027
of 9,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,765
of 267,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#15
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,037,100 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.