| Title |
Targeting Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels for Neuropathic Pain Management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurotherapeutics, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.07.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle Perret, Z. David Luo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 23% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,201,950
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#192
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,033
of 106,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.