| Title |
Pharmacokinetic studies of ivermectin: Effects of formulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Veterinary Research Communications, December 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02215150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pak-Kan Albert Lo, David W. Fink, James B. Williams, Jack Blodinger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,530,736
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research Communications
#18
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#924
of 42,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research Communications
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them