Title |
The genetic basis of pear-shaped tomato fruit
|
---|---|
Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, September 1999
|
DOI | 10.1007/s001220051304 |
Authors |
H.-M. Ku, S. Doganlar, K.-Y. Chen, S. D. Tanksley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
Nepal | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Cuba | 1 | 1% |
Israel | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 58 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 73% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,118,210
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#140
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,330
of 35,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.