| Title |
A flame process for synthesis of unagglomerated, low-oxygen nanoparticles: Application to Ti and TiB2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, December 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11663-997-0076-5 |
| Authors |
R. L. Axelbaum, S. M. L. Sastry, D. P. Dufaux, C. A. Frey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 6 | 32% |
| Engineering | 5 | 26% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2011.
All research outputs
#4,767,124
of 23,061,402 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
#23
of 658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,856
of 94,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,061,402 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 658 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them