↓ Skip to main content

Executive dysfunction in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Executive dysfunction in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3
Published in
Journal of Neurology, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00415-018-8883-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Itaru Tamura, Asako Takei, Shinsuke Hamada, Hiroyuki Soma, Michio Nonaka, Sanae Homma, Fumio Moriwaka

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the cognitive functions of patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3(SCA3). We examined 15 patients with genetically confirmed SCA3 and 15 healthy control subjects matched for age, years of education, and intellectual ability. We administered verbal memory (word recall and word recognition) and executive function tasks (word fluency test, forward and backward digit and visual span tests, Kana Pick-out Test, Trail Making Test, and conflicting instructions and a Go/NoGo task from the Frontal Assessment Battery). We found that patients with SCA3 had significantly lower scores than the healthy control subjects on the word recall, semantic, and letter fluency, and backward digit span tests, while word recognition was well preserved. The other executive function tests showed preserved functions in the SCA3 group, indicating that visual working memory, and attention and inhibition control were not affected. The patients with SCA3 showed impaired word recall and intact word recognition, and accordingly, episodic memory encoding and storage processes in short-term memory were preserved. In category and letter-fluency tests, impairment was attributable to word-retrieval from semantic memory. Impaired verbal working memory may be involved in the retrieval of verbal information from phonological storage by means of continuous subvocal rehearsal, rather than a deficit in initial phonological encoding. Essential executive dysfunction in patients with SCA3 may be due to damage in the cerebellar cortex-ventral dentate nucleus-thalamus-prefrontal cortex circuits, which are involved in strategic retrieval of verbal information from different modes of memory storage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 34%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 24%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,109,197
of 23,061,402 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#688
of 4,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,974
of 326,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#11
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,061,402 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.