You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disease‐Specific Expression of Tartrate‐Resistant Acid Phosphatase Isoforms*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.10.1916 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony J Janckila, Yuri R Nakasato, David H Neustadt, Lung T Yam |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2012.
All research outputs
#8,588,963
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#2,197
of 4,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,653
of 177,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#488
of 1,260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.