↓ Skip to main content

A proof of the Hilbert-Smith conjecture for actions by Lipschitz maps

Overview of attention for article published in Mathematische Annalen, June 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
A proof of the Hilbert-Smith conjecture for actions by Lipschitz maps
Published in
Mathematische Annalen, June 1997
DOI 10.1007/s002080050080
Authors

Dus˘an Repovs˘, Evgenij V. S˘c˘epin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 5 125%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,541,528
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Mathematische Annalen
#54
of 868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,253
of 30,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematische Annalen
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 868 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them